<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Ruben Amaro,</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatballsouttahere.com/2009/07/19/dear-ruben-amaro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatballsouttahere.com/2009/07/19/dear-ruben-amaro/</link>
	<description>A Philadelphia Phillies Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: branthoughton</title>
		<link>http://thatballsouttahere.com/2009/07/19/dear-ruben-amaro/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>branthoughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatballsouttahere.com/?p=219#comment-14</guid>
		<description>It does not matter any more, the Padres traded Meredith last night to the Orioles for just a utility player in Oscar Salazar. I knew it would be nothing big, so why did the Phils not jump at the opportunity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not matter any more, the Padres traded Meredith last night to the Orioles for just a utility player in Oscar Salazar. I knew it would be nothing big, so why did the Phils not jump at the opportunity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeljong</title>
		<link>http://thatballsouttahere.com/2009/07/19/dear-ruben-amaro/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeljong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatballsouttahere.com/?p=219#comment-13</guid>
		<description>The Padres would not willingly jump in on a deal that didn&#039;t involve some prospects and not another contract coming back to them. They shed a $1M contract in Jody Gerut earlier this season, they&#039;re not likely to take back anything but prospects.

That being said, the offer to Toronto is interesting. I&#039;d wonder if the Jays wouldn&#039;t lower their price to just the prospects if the Phillies took back Alex Rios&#039; contract. Still, trading Victorino intrigues me. Both him and Rios are similar in age (Victorino a bit older) but Victorino is still under team control for another two years for arbitration money. If he can pump out 4 WAR seasons, he may be worth it.

Then again, that would involve the Jays giving up on Rios after a bad half season. His previous three seasons, he racked up 17 wins and some $55M worth. It would be difficult for them to part with that. They&#039;d much rather part with Wells, but Wells&#039; contract is so bad compared to two seasons of production that there&#039;s no way they&#039;ll unload him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Padres would not willingly jump in on a deal that didn&#8217;t involve some prospects and not another contract coming back to them. They shed a $1M contract in Jody Gerut earlier this season, they&#8217;re not likely to take back anything but prospects.</p>
<p>That being said, the offer to Toronto is interesting. I&#8217;d wonder if the Jays wouldn&#8217;t lower their price to just the prospects if the Phillies took back Alex Rios&#8217; contract. Still, trading Victorino intrigues me. Both him and Rios are similar in age (Victorino a bit older) but Victorino is still under team control for another two years for arbitration money. If he can pump out 4 WAR seasons, he may be worth it.</p>
<p>Then again, that would involve the Jays giving up on Rios after a bad half season. His previous three seasons, he racked up 17 wins and some $55M worth. It would be difficult for them to part with that. They&#8217;d much rather part with Wells, but Wells&#8217; contract is so bad compared to two seasons of production that there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;ll unload him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
